Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ãø¸ðµÎºÎ ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ °ñ°Ý¼º II±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ Ã»¼Ò³âÀÇ ¼ºÀå ´Ü°èº° »ó±âµµºÎÀÇ °èÃø ºÐ¼®

Pharyngeal Airway Dimensions in Skeletal Class II Young Adolescents : Cephalometric Study

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 2018³â 45±Ç 1È£ p.98 ~ 108
õ¹Î°æ, ¾ç¼±¹Ì, ±èÀçȯ, ±è¼±¹Ì, ÃÖ³²±â,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
õ¹Î°æ ( Cheon Min-Kyoung ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
¾ç¼±¹Ì ( Yang Sun-Mi ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±èÀçȯ ( Kim Jae-Hwan ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±è¼±¹Ì ( Kim Seon-Mi ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
ÃÖ³²±â ( Choi Nam-Ki ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ¼Ò¾Æ ¹× û¼Ò³âÀÇ ¼ºÀå´Ü°èº°(¼ºÀå±ÞÁõ±â ÀÌÀü, ¼ºÀå±ÞÁõ±â, ¼ºÀå±ÞÁõ±â ÀÌÈÄ) °ñ°Ý¼º II±Þ 1·ù ¹× 2·ù ȯÀÚÀÇ ºñÀÎÈÄ ¹× ±¸°­ÀÎÈÄ ºÎÀ§ÀÎ »ó±âµµºÎÀÇ ±âµµ Æø°æÀ» Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇÔÀÌ´Ù. °ñ°Ý¼º I±Þ û¼Ò³âÀ» ´ëÁ¶±ºÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°úº´¿ø ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°ú¿¡ ³»¿øÇÑ ¼Ò¾Æ ¹× û¼Ò³âȯÀÚ 159¸í(°ñ°Ý¼º I±Þ 70¸í, °ñ°Ý¼º II±Þ 1·ù 51¸í, II±Þ 2·ù 38¸í)À» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Ãø¸ðµÎºÎ ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø°ú ¼ö¿ÏºÎ ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¼ºÀå´Ü°èº°·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù(¼ºÀå±ÞÁõ±â Àü, ¼ºÀå±ÞÁõ±â, ¼ºÀå±ÞÁõ±â ÈÄ). »ó±âµµºÎÀÇ ÇغÎÇÐÀû Æø°æÀ» ÃøÁ¤Çϱâ À§Çؼ­ 13°³ÀÇ °èÃøÁ¡, 5°³ÀÇ °èÃø°¢, 5°³ÀÇ °èÃø¼±, 3°³ÀÇ ºñÀ²À» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±× °á°ú, ºñÀÎÈÄ ¹× ±¸°­ÀÎÈÄ ºÎÀ§ÀÇ ÀüÈĹæ Æø°æÀº Á¶»çµÈ ¸ðµç ±×·ì¿¡¼­ ¼ºÀå°ú ÇÔ²² Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ¿¡ µû¸¥ ºñÀÎÈÄ ±âµµ ºÎÀ§¿Í »óºÎ ±¸°­ÀÎÈÄ ±âµµ ºÎÀ§ Æø°æÀÇ Åë°èÀû Â÷À̸¦ ¹àÈ÷Áö´Â ¸øÇÏ¿´À¸³ª, ÇϺΠ±¸°­ÀÎÈÄ ±âµµºÎÀÇ ÀüÈĹæ Æø°æÀº °ñ°ÝÀû II±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ±ºÀÌ 1±Þ ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕ±ºº¸´Ù ´õ Á¼°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.

This study aimed to evaluate the nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal dimensions of the patients with skeletal class II division 1 or division 2 patterns during the pre-peak, peak, and post-peak growth periods for comparison with a skeletal class I control group (79 for pre-peak, 40 for peak, 40 for post-peak). Total 159 lateral cephalograms (70 for skeletal class I, 51 for skeletal class II, division 1, and 38 for skeletal class II, division 2) were selected. The growth of anteroposterior dimension of the pharyngeal airway were statistically significant among growth periods. The dimension for the nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal airway space was the smallest in the division 1 skeletal class II group followed by class II division 2 and skeletal class I.

Å°¿öµå

Pharyngeal airway; Lateral cephalogram; Skeletal pattern; Peak height velocity

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI